On July 2, we were aroused at 7 AM by unison calling of Roy and Millie. Twin colts, Jacques and Phyl, had trailed their parents around our cranberry bog for almost three weeks since hatch on June 10th and 11th. At 10 PM on the previous evening, the colts snuggled under Millie's wings and slept at the habitual family roosting site among grasses and cattails on a point jutting into the pond.
When we glanced at cattail point that July morning, we saw Jacques running back and forth between his parents, looking for food. The adults flapped their wings twice, peered down at a tawny mass half-hidden in the grass, preened, and walked around. After careful examination through a spotting scope, we saw that the object of their gaze was Phyl's inert body. The photo above shows Millie looking down at Phyl.
Fifty-five minutes later, Jacques watched as Millie and Roy called again and then exchanged duets with a pair of cranes across the valley. When the conversation finished, the smaller family continued to forage for insects.
Phyl's death that night was not a total surprise to us. The temperature on the first of July was almost 80ยบ F, hot for Interior Alaska. Phyl lagged 10-15 meters behind the rest as they foraged and when they paused, she sat down. Jacques followed close upon the heels of his parents and thus ate the bulk of the insects. Periodically, Millie carried a dragonfly back to Phyl and she ate (pictured below). We don't know whether these tidbits provided sufficient nourishment for her needs, but later Jacques, Phyl and their parents shared a hearty supper of fresh duckling provided by Roy (another duck feast was described in the previous blogpost) before all repaired to cat-tail point. As the the colts reached cattail point, Jacques pecked very gently at Millie's shoulder; she sat down in the tall grass, and the colts slipped under her wings. Phyl was lifeless in the morning.
The events reminded us of behavior we saw in 2004 on the day before the colt named Woodstock died. The twin colts were 2.5 months old. On Woodstock's next-to-last day, he often huddled on the ground with head under wing. At least once, Peter Pan, the stronger colt, went over to Woodstock, settled down next to him, and spent many minutes looking at his twin, as seen in the picture below. After Woodstock's death, our notes show that the parents carefully examined the corpse, but we do not have extended observations like those for Phyl's death in 2009. We saw no agonistic displays or fighting between healthy and failing colts in 2004 or 2009.
Phyl's death profoundly affected the behavior of Millie and Roy. It evoked memories of the poignant PBS Nature depictions of an obsessive female chimpanzee who carried the corpse of her deceased infant for many days. Unusual behaviors associated with death have been reported for many species, including primates1 and elephants2. [See also the Comment below from Roger Payne, who describes the behavior of two helper whales when another whale is ill or dying. As to what emotion underlies such behavior, Roger prudently notes: "I think that the only answer is that we still don't know what emotions species experience..."]We can't put ourselves inside the head of another species, but we do recognize that behavior is strongly influenced by emotions. The cranes' behavior on July 2nd indisputably reflected their distressed emotional state. Repeatedly, Roy and Millie interrupted their foraging to return to the cattail point and linger near the body in what we term a "visitation". At the end of the day, all three cranes danced with fierce intensity.
Five minutes after the family had begun their first morning dragonfly safari, Roy returned alone to cattail point to stand next to Phyl. Once there, he craned his neck and peered at the fluffy corpse for about five minutes. He appeared to offer an insect to the ground; then he rejoined the hunt in the deep grass. Six minutes later, all three cranes stopped insect harvesting and came back to the body. Roy and Jacques stayed briefly but Millie spent 28 minutes preening.
Were these visitations merely to check Phyl's status? Perhaps they were waiting for Phyl to revive? There was no hint of scavenging after Phyl died. During the many visitations, no behavior toward Phyl's body remotely resembled the savagery evident while the duckling corpse was being decimated on the previous evening.
As reported by Eugenia Bragina in a comment below, Siberian Crane parents were attentive to the corpses of colts at the Oka Crane Breeding Center. In 2004, Roy, Millie, and Peter Pan stood quietly near's Woodstock's body after he died. The emotion behind such behaviors may be an avian version of worry or of grief. Roy visited cattail point briefly three more times (2, 7, and 15 minutes) in the morning, sometimes uttering low vocalizations that were just audible to us one hundred meters away. Shortly after he rejoined the others in foraging, it became Millie's turn to visit cattail point. She preened, walked around the body, examined it closely, and bent down so that the underside of her beak was close to the inert mass of feathers. She made two more visitations (2 and 7 minutes). At noon, the whole family walked over to the roost site. In the picture above, the adults are preening. Phyl's body is in the grass to Jacques' left.
In the early afternoon, the family hunted. At 3:15 PM, Roy spent 45 minutes in Phyl's vicinity, looking, preening, stepping around the body, and then somewhat curiously, going through ritualized slow head movements: turning left, bending down and picking up something (perhaps a piece of grass, a twig or blade of cattail), and then turning right, bending down, and apparently dropping the object. The motor pattern was indistinguishable from nest building that we have watched each May. He repeated the sequence as if he was starting to make a pile of grass beside the body. Roy shifted slightly to one side and made another "pile" in a new place. In the picture below, Phyl's body is in the lower right corner. Millie is bending down in a typical nest building stance and she holds a brownish bit of cattail blade in her beak.
In her Master's thesis written over thirty years ago, Karen Voss described repetitive ritualized placement of twigs and grass when Greater Sandhill Cranes built their nests in Wisconsin. She also observed ritualized nest-building in 6-month-old cranes, even though these young birds had no actual nest site.3 But for this July 2 episode, we haven't see ritualized nest building except in early May.There were more visitations in late afternoon and early evening. Four more times, Millie or Roy initiated grass-piling bouts. In three cases, the pile, had it been visible, would be located beside the body and once on the body itself. Just before roosting time, all three cranes walked to bog central and foraged.

The sun was sinking behind the west ridge, creating long shadows like that produced by Roy's neck (above) and broad bright and dull stripes across the grass (below).
At 9:52 PM, Roy stepped into a stripe of sunlight, jumped, and the whole family began to dance explosively. They danced and danced and danced on the dramatically side-lit grassy stage. Even Jacques, barely three weeks old, joined in with gusto. Fortuitously, Christy's cameras were focused on bog central when the dance erupted for three minutes and 107 photographs.
After the dance coda, Roy walked forward into shadow and stood for a minute or more. Then all three cranes returned to roost at cattail point. Roy slept standing on one leg; Millie settled down next to Phyl's body, and Jacques climbed under her wing. For more images go to Christy Yuncker Photo Journal.
The memorable dance was neither frenetic nor flailing. It was extended in duration, intense, and very fast, but the moves were controlled, fluid, graceful, and balanced. Each bird exhibited with high energy, and yet all three were attuned. The photo above shows Roy as he dashed from the right in front of Millie who is at the apex of a spectacular high jump with wings straight out. As she landed, Roy wheeled to face her and bowed in a forward display (see Quicktime movie below). Then he spread his wings, jumped, and turned left to engage Jacques in a upright spread-wing face-off. The movie below shows a 4 second segment of the overall dance that lasted 160 seconds. See also the link to our Photo Gallery.

The intensity and duration of the dancing after the death of Phyl strongly suggests that dancing provides emotional release for cranes. It is widely recognized that dancing strengthens and reaffirms the pair-bond, and in this instance, dancing reinforced family solidarity and and promoted continuity.
At 9:52 PM, Roy stepped into a stripe of sunlight, jumped, and the whole family began to dance explosively. They danced and danced and danced on the dramatically side-lit grassy stage. Even Jacques, barely three weeks old, joined in with gusto. Fortuitously, Christy's cameras were focused on bog central when the dance erupted for three minutes and 107 photographs.
After the dance coda, Roy walked forward into shadow and stood for a minute or more. Then all three cranes returned to roost at cattail point. Roy slept standing on one leg; Millie settled down next to Phyl's body, and Jacques climbed under her wing. For more images go to Christy Yuncker Photo Journal.
The memorable dance was neither frenetic nor flailing. It was extended in duration, intense, and very fast, but the moves were controlled, fluid, graceful, and balanced. Each bird exhibited with high energy, and yet all three were attuned. The photo above shows Roy as he dashed from the right in front of Millie who is at the apex of a spectacular high jump with wings straight out. As she landed, Roy wheeled to face her and bowed in a forward display (see Quicktime movie below). Then he spread his wings, jumped, and turned left to engage Jacques in a upright spread-wing face-off. The movie below shows a 4 second segment of the overall dance that lasted 160 seconds. See also the link to our Photo Gallery.The intensity and duration of the dancing after the death of Phyl strongly suggests that dancing provides emotional release for cranes. It is widely recognized that dancing strengthens and reaffirms the pair-bond, and in this instance, dancing reinforced family solidarity and and promoted continuity.
All summer from May into August, Roy replaces his flight feathers, one-by-one. During the vigorous dancing, several old feathers fell out and floated to the grass. The photo below was taken just after the finale of the solidarity dance. Roy is walking toward us. A loose whitish primary feather that is dropping from his left wing has been highlighted by the sunlight.
In the days since, Roy and Millie carry on as characteristically attentive crane parents, feeding and guarding Jacques as they guide his progress through core subjects of Foraging and Display/Dance.When we first posted this blog, it had been a week since Phyl died.
We saw no dancing during that entire week. We monitored the pond all day; Phyl's body was not scavenged nor did the crane family returned to cattail point. After July 2, the cranes began to roost 50 meters to the east. The photo to the right shows Phyl's skeletonized corpse on August 10 - 6 weeks after her death. Insects and bacteria have cleaned away flesh, but the body is still not scavenged.
For us, July 2 is unforgettable - repeated visitations to Phyl's corpse climaxed by the Dance of Solidarity.
There are so many aspects of such behavior that need further study and explanation. For example, what is the adaptive significance of the ritualized grass-piling behavior?
In the words of Peter Marler8:
We welcome your reactions to our blog. If you have relevant interpretations or observations that you are willing to share with others, either click on the word "Comment" at the bottom of this blog or email us directly. With your permission, we will paste your email as a Comment below.
References cited:
1. Citations in LiveScience column entitled "Grief: the price of love" by Meridith F. Small.
2. Citations on Elephant information website.
3. Voss KS 1976. Behavior of the greater sandhill crane. Thesis for Master of Science in Zoology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
4. Bekoff M. 2007. Are you feeling what I'm feeling? New Scientist. 26 May 2007, p. 44 (Grief).
5. Bekoff M. 2009. A fox, a cougar, and a funeral. Psychology Today blog
6. O'Connor MF, Irwin MR, Wellisch DK 2009. When grief heats up: Pro-inflammatory cytokines predict regional brain activation. Neuroimage May 29 Epub.
7. O'Connor MF, Wellisch DK, Stanton AL, Eisenberger NI, Irwin MR, Lieberman MD, 2008. Craving love? Enduring grief activates brain's reward center. Neuroimage 42:969-72.
8. Marler P 2004. Bird songs: a cornucopia for communication. In Nature's Music: The Science of Bird Song, P. Marler & H Slabbenkoorn (eds.),132-177. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 172.
For us, July 2 is unforgettable - repeated visitations to Phyl's corpse climaxed by the Dance of Solidarity.
There are so many aspects of such behavior that need further study and explanation. For example, what is the adaptive significance of the ritualized grass-piling behavior?
- For re-nesting? The grass-piling could be tentative restarting of nest-building in response to death of an offspring. In this context, "death of a colt" (reproductive failure) leads cranes to initiate another reproductive cycle. When eggs fail to hatch, a second nesting is common at lower latitudes where summer seasons are longer than Alaska.
- For concealing the body? The grass-piling might be like a motor behavior module, a sequence of postures and movements driven by neural circuitry (a fixed-action pattern in classical ethology). Such a piling module could be used to build a nest or to hide a corpse that might otherwise atttract predators to the nest territory.
- For grieving? Piling could be part of animal version of grieving behavior. Marc Bekoff has reported similar "funeral" incidents, in magpies (standing vigil for several minutes and piling grasses near a dead magpie at the side of a road)4 and in a fox (piling dirt on the corpse of a fox killed by a cougar).5 Perhaps ritualized piling behavior has deep evolutionary roots and is somehow hard-wired in the nervous systems of birds and mammals?
- Merely a general expression of stress? In ethological terminology, piling might be displacement behavior, as suggested by the comment below from Eugenia Bragina. George Archibald notes below that cranes dance when they are upset by some event, such as the approach of a predator. Perhaps grass-piling and the intense dance simply reflect emotional stress.
In the words of Peter Marler8:
"...emotion-based displays can of course convey a lot of information."We suspect that both emotional and cognitive factors contributed to the displays and other behaviors we witnessed after the death of Phyl.
We welcome your reactions to our blog. If you have relevant interpretations or observations that you are willing to share with others, either click on the word "Comment" at the bottom of this blog or email us directly. With your permission, we will paste your email as a Comment below.
References cited:
1. Citations in LiveScience column entitled "Grief: the price of love" by Meridith F. Small.
2. Citations on Elephant information website.
3. Voss KS 1976. Behavior of the greater sandhill crane. Thesis for Master of Science in Zoology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
4. Bekoff M. 2007. Are you feeling what I'm feeling? New Scientist. 26 May 2007, p. 44 (Grief).
5. Bekoff M. 2009. A fox, a cougar, and a funeral. Psychology Today blog
6. O'Connor MF, Irwin MR, Wellisch DK 2009. When grief heats up: Pro-inflammatory cytokines predict regional brain activation. Neuroimage May 29 Epub.
7. O'Connor MF, Wellisch DK, Stanton AL, Eisenberger NI, Irwin MR, Lieberman MD, 2008. Craving love? Enduring grief activates brain's reward center. Neuroimage 42:969-72.
8. Marler P 2004. Bird songs: a cornucopia for communication. In Nature's Music: The Science of Bird Song, P. Marler & H Slabbenkoorn (eds.),132-177. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 172.
Revised July 31, 2009




















